☰
HEF4053BT,652
HEF4053BT,652
Obsolete
Description:  IC SWITCH SPDT X 3 155OHM 16SO
Manufacturer:  Nexperia
History Price: $0.61000
In Stock: 47560
HEF4053BT,652 Specification
Specification
Mfr Part
HEF4053BT,652
Category
Interface - Analog Switches, Multiplexers, Demultiplexers
Manufacturer
Nexperia
Series
-
Packaging
Tube
Status
Obsolete
Environmental Compliance
Lead Free
Radiation Hardening
No
REACH SVHC
No SVHC
RoHS
Compliant
HS Code
-
Technical Parameter
Switch Circuit
SPDT
Multiplexer/Demultiplexer Circuit
2:1
Number of Circuits
3
On-State Resistance (Max)
155Ohm
Channel-to-Channel Matching (ΔRon)
5Ohm
Voltage - Supply, Single (V-)
3V ~ 15V
Voltage - Supply, Dual (V?
-
Switch Time (Ton, Toff) (Max)
-
-3db Bandwidth
70MHz
Charge Injection
-
Channel Capacitance (CS(off), CD(off))
7.5pF
Current - Leakage (IS(off)) (Max)
200nA
Crosstalk
-50dB @ 1MHz
Operating Temperature
-40 ℃ ~ 125 ℃ (TA)
Mounting Type
Surface Mount
Package / Case
16-SOIC (0.154", 3.90mm Width)
Supplier Device Package
16-SO
HEF4053BT,652 Compare Parts
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4952BT,112
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4067BT-Q100J
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4067BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4067BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4067BT,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4067BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4066BT-Q100J
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4066BT-Q100
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4066BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4066BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4066BT,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4066BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BTT-Q100J
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BTT,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BTT,112
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT/C118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT/AUJ
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT-Q100J
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT-Q100J
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT-Q100118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BTT-Q100,11
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BTT,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BTT,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BTT,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BTT,112
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BTT,112
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT/S200118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT/C118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT/AUJ
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT-Q100,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT,013
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTT/S411118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTT-Q100118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTT-Q100118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTT-Q100,11
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTT,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTS,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTS,112
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT/S999118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT/S400118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT/S200118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT/AUJ
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT-Q100,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT,013
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT,013
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4016BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4016BT,653
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4016BT,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4016BP,652
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4053BT/AU118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4052BT118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTT/C1118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BTS,118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4051BT/AU118
  • HEF4053BT,652 vs HEF4016BT,653
  • Customer Reviews
    4.95 out of 5.00 stars from 147 customer reviews from all over the world
    Xuxa
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-09-25 08:32
    Very good component, tested and approved!
    Fábio Gomes Ferreira
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-09-25 06:52
    Everything right according to the description
    Martín Antonio
    Spain
    5 stars
    2026-09-24 16:15
    Everything is great!
    Olivier Delaunay
    France
    5 stars
    2026-09-24 15:22
    Conforme j’ai reçu des BTA16-600B
    Gustavo Alves Filho
    Brazil
    5 stars
    2026-09-24 14:51
    Delivered on time Congratulations!!!!
    Emily King
    United States
    5 stars
    2026-09-23 20:54
    The inscription is very clear, but gave to identify the component.